User talk:Galrion: Difference between revisions
imported>Galrion m Correcting incorrect link for any future readers, replying to Nelson |
→A second KS wiki?: Reply to Glarion |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
::::The example page seems to work very well. I can see crediting contributer content is important, but would it be confusing for a user to see a link to such a similar site? Anyways, it's perfect that we can use their content.[[User:Nelsonngyn0|Nelsonngyn0]] ([[User talk:Nelsonngyn0|talk]]) 20:53, January 28, 2013 (UTC) | ::::The example page seems to work very well. I can see crediting contributer content is important, but would it be confusing for a user to see a link to such a similar site? Anyways, it's perfect that we can use their content.[[User:Nelsonngyn0|Nelsonngyn0]] ([[User talk:Nelsonngyn0|talk]]) 20:53, January 28, 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{RI}} I agree it's confusing to link to the other wiki, but you kind-of need it as part of the attribution clause in the license :/. | {{RI}} I agree it's confusing to link to the other wiki, but you kind-of need it as part of the attribution clause in the license :/. That's why I just made it a little footnote in my draft, and if you like you could always omit the link on the page itself and include it on the talk page by, for example: <code><nowiki>{{User:Galrion/Drafts/Crosswiki Notice|2=an older KS wiki (now dead)}}</nowiki></code>: | ||
{{User:Galrion/Drafts/Crosswiki Notice|2=an older KS wiki (now dead)}} | {{User:Galrion/Drafts/Crosswiki Notice|2=an older KS wiki (now dead)}} | ||
How do you feel about that style? | How do you feel about that style? I'm happy to redo the template to be nicer syntax if you think that style is more accessible — '''[[User:Galrion|<span style="color:black; text-decoration:underline">Galrion</span>]]''' ([[User_talk:Galrion|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Galrion|C]]) 23:25, January 28, 2013 (UTC) |